ScienceDaily (Oct. 20, 2011) With age, forgetfulness and other signs of memory loss sometimes appear, prompting elderly individuals to seek a medical evaluation amid fears that they may be experiencing early symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common type of dementia among Americans aged 65 and older.
But even when early memory problems suggest the potential for impending AD, the actual risk is variable. Some patients are at high risk while others are not. The challenge for doctors has long been to differentiate that risk so they can determine the appropriate course of management.
In a paper to be published in the October 25 issue of the journal Neurology, a team of physicians and scientists from the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine and elsewhere describe using a combination of broadly available medical tests to produce a much improved predictive picture of the likelihood of impending AD in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) — an intermediate stage between the expected cognitive decline of normal aging and the more pronounced decline of dementia.
“I’m extremely excited about these results,” said neurologist James Brewer, MD, PhD, an associate professor of radiology and neurosciences and part of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative research team at UC San Diego. “The good news is that we can partially reassure those folks who are negative on these tests, at least regarding their next three years. We have never been able to do that before. These individuals, despite having a real memory problem, have no greater risk of near-term dementia than a similarly aged healthy person without a memory complaint.”
To determine the likelihood of developing Alzheimer’s disease, the UC San Diego researchers compared risk factors based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and neuropsychological testing. Unlike other efforts that have evaluated the predictive capabilities of research-based biomarkers, MRI, CSF and neuropsychological tests are all technologies widely available to clinicians.
The researchers found that these available biomarkers significantly improved accuracy in predicting near-term conversion to dementia. In combination, their prediction rate was almost perfect: None of the individuals who tested negative on all three measures went on to develop AD in the three-year follow-up. By comparison, almost 90 percent of individuals who tested positive on all three measures were demented at the end of three years.
The presence of medial temporal atrophy, determined by automated analysis of MRI using an FDA-approved software package, was associated with the likeliest chance of near-term dementia, with a median dementia-free survival time of only 15 months.
Brewer said the findings foretell a paradigm shift in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease.
“Instead of saying, ‘Let’s wait a year and see if this gets worse,’ our neurologists can say, ‘Let’s get a volumetric MRI and check back in a month to see if your complaint is due to neurodegeneration.’ That ability makes a huge difference in how we proceed. Maybe the memory complaint isn’t due to neurodegeneration, but rather it’s a side effect of a medication, a sign of depression or someone is simply anxious and worried. Being able to reassure at least some patients that they are not at significant near-term risk of AD is something we never could do in the past, given the high prevalence of the disease.”
Funding for this paper came, in part, from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering and contributions from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer Schering Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai Inc., Elan Corporation, Genetech Inc., GE Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, Innogenetics, Johnson Johnson, Eli Lilly and Co., Medpace, Inc., Merck and Co., Inc., Novartis, Pfizer Inc., Roche, Schering-Plough Corp., Synarc, Inc. and Wyeth, as well as the Alzheimer’s Association and the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation.
Recommend this story on Facebook, Twitter,
and Google +1:
Other bookmarking and sharing tools:
The above story is reprinted from materials provided by University of California – San Diego.
Note: ScienceDaily reserves the right to edit materials for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.
- D. Heister, J. B. Brewer, S. Magda, K. Blennow, L. K. McEvoy. Predicting MCI outcome with clinically available MRI and CSF biomarkers. Neurology, 2011; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182343314
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.